Chapter 03
Underground Years,
Arrest & Imprisonment
1932 — 1939
Seven years, and only a handful of dated facts survive from inside them. This chapter keeps to what the record holds: an arrest in male attire, months as a fugitive, a second arrest on a named day, a supplementary trial, a sentence of transportation for life, and a release.
- Sept 1932First arrest
- 19 May 1933Second arrest
- 1933Transportation for life
- 1939Release
01
Sept 1932 – May 1933
Living underground
Her first arrest came in September 1932, while she was surveying the area around the Pahartali European Club before a planned attack. Accounts record that she was dressed in male attire, that this drew police attention, and that she was taken roughly a week before the operation. She was released on bail because there was no concrete evidence tying her to Surya Sen's organisation.
She did not go back to Calcutta and she did not go home. She went underground, and stayed there for something in the order of eight months.
What that meant, in practice, is worth stating without romance. It meant having no fixed address in a district under saturation policing. It meant depending entirely on other people's willingness to shelter someone the government wanted, at a time when sheltering such a person was itself an offence. It meant that the ordinary machinery of a life — a name, an examination, a family, a return — was suspended indefinitely, with no way of knowing for how long.
Accounts of this period also describe an unsuccessful attempt to breach a prison wall with explosives in order to free imprisoned revolutionaries. The attempt failed. Reports of it differ in detail, and it is recorded here as it appears in the sources rather than reconstructed.
02
16 Feb 1933
The search intensifies
On 16 February 1933, Surya Sen was arrested. He had been sheltering in the house of a family member and was betrayed by a relative, Netra Sen. With the leader of the organisation in custody, the search for everyone still at liberty became the administration's main business in the district.
Accounts record that Kalpana Datta evaded capture on that occasion and remained at large for a further three months. The details of how vary between retellings; the interval itself is consistent across them.
Between February and May 1933 the Chittagong organisation effectively ceased to exist as a functioning body. She remained a fugitive from an organisation that no longer had a command to answer to.
19 May 1933
The second arrest
She was arrested on 19 May 1933. This date is one of the firmest in her whole biography: it appears consistently across reference sources, because it entered the official record of a criminal case and stayed there.
She was twenty years old, had been a member of the organisation for two years, and had been at large for eight months.
04
1933
Trial and sentence
She was tried in the second supplementary trial of the Chittagong Armoury Raid case. Supplementary trials dealt with defendants who came into custody after the main proceedings had already concluded — the principal trial had ended in January 1932, with judgment delivered on 1 March that year.
She was sentenced to transportation for life.
What “transportation for life” meant
Transportation was a sentence of forced removal from India to a penal settlement, most notoriously the Cellular Jail in the Andaman Islands. “For life” did not necessarily mean until death, but it was indefinite, and it carried the additional punishment of severance: from family, from language, from any prospect of ordinary return.
Twelve defendants in the main Chittagong trial were sentenced to deportation for life to the Andamans. The available sources do not record Kalpana Datta being transported there, and this archive does not assume it. What the record establishes is the sentence, and that she was released in 1939.
05
1933 – 1939
Six years
The interior of those six years is largely absent from the accessible record. That absence is itself characteristic: prison years produce paperwork about a person and very little from them, and the documents that do survive were written by the institution holding them.
The public context can be described. Through the 1930s the condition of political prisoners in Bengal was a recurring public controversy, argued over in the press, in the legislature and through hunger strikes inside the jails themselves. Campaigns for the release of the Chittagong prisoners continued throughout the decade.
Several accounts connect her release to that campaigning, and some name appeals associated with Mahatma Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore. A few also describe a visit by Gandhi to her in prison. These claims appear in secondary and popular accounts; this archive has not been able to confirm them against a primary or governmental source, and they are set down here as reported claims rather than as established fact.
06 — The gate opens
1939
Released at twenty-six, with a degree still unfinished.
She was released in 1939. Bina Das, sentenced separately in 1932 to nine years' rigorous imprisonment, was released in April of the same year.
It is worth noticing what she did next, because it settles a question about who she was. She did not withdraw, and she did not immediately return to politics either. She went back to the University of Calcutta and finished the degree that her arrest had interrupted, graduating in 1940 — eleven years after matriculating, at twenty-seven, with a life sentence and six years in custody behind her.
Everything the rest of this archive describes — the party work, the famine relief, the election, the memoir, the decades at the Indian Statistical Institute — happens after this point. She was twenty-six. She had roughly fifty-six years left.
On the limits of this chapter
What this archive does not know about these seven years.
-
Which prisons held her
Some accounts name Alipore in Calcutta. The sources consulted here do not give a complete or consistent custodial record, so none is presented.
-
The exact terms of her release
The year is consistent across sources. The legal instrument — remission, amnesty, commutation or expiry of a specific order — is not stated in the references available to this archive.
-
Her own account of the period
Her memoir concerns the Chittagong revolutionaries. Readers wanting her voice on any part of this chapter should go to that text rather than to this summary of it. See Books & Further Reading.
-
Anything about her interior life
What she thought, feared, regretted or resolved during six years in custody is not documented in the sources used here, and is not invented for the sake of a better story.